Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gideon Caplan
3 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz
4 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 3
4 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 5
26 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
1 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 8
1 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-166

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement