Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Defining upper gastrointestinal bleeding from linked primary and secondary care data and the effect on occurrence and 28 day mortality

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma
3 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katia Verhamme
10 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Colin Crooks
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma
30 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katia Verhamme
17 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Colin Crooks
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-392

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement