Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Investigating the purpose of an online discussion group for health professionals: a case example from forensic occupational therapy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tija Zarkovic Palijan
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray
30 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant
11 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Edward Duncan
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant
9 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Edward Duncan
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray
26 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant
27 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Edward Duncan
Resubmission - Version 4
27 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
3 Jul 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-253

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement