This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Investigating the purpose of an online discussion group for health professionals: a case example from forensic occupational therapy
© Dieleman and Duncan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 September 2012
Accepted: 28 June 2013
Published: 3 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tija Zarkovic Palijan|
|26 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray|
|30 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant|
|11 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray|
|4 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant|
|9 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Murray|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Bryant|
|27 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-253|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.