Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Predictors of default from follow-up care in a cervical cancer screening program using direct visual inspection in south-western Nigeria

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Quinlivan
6 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monjurul Hoque
23 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - OLIVER Chukwujekwu EZECHI
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - OLIVER Chukwujekwu EZECHI
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monjurul Hoque
10 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Quinlivan
24 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - OLIVER Chukwujekwu EZECHI
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-143

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement