Skip to content

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research

  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1
BMC Health Services Research201414 (Suppl 2) :O32

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-S2-O32

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Cultural Adaptation
  • Implementation Research
  • International Program
  • German Sample
  • Program Type

Background

One issue that remains to be solved in implementation research is adherence or adaptation dilemma [1, 2]. In essence, this concerns to what degree and how evidence-based programs can be modified in accordance with restraints and possibilities in local context. This study compares effectiveness of program constructions (i.e., novel programs, adopted from other contexts with or without adaptations) in two meta-analytic data sets in two European countries.

Materials and methods

Results are based on studies evaluating German child and youth preventative interventions (n=158), and Swedish psychological and social interventions (n=139). Interventions were categorized with three broad-band categories (novel programs, international adoption, and adaptation) and six sub-categories (innovation, conceptually new, adoption, cultural adaptation, pragmatic adaptation, and eclectic adaptation). All studies were coded by a trained coder followed by a second independent coding. The effect size of the outcomes of these program types were compared.

Results

Novel programs, i.e. completely or conceptually new national programs, were the program type with the highest effect size in the German sample and among the highest in the Swedish sample. In both samples, international programs adopted without any adaptations were the least effective, even after controlling for crucial methodological aspects (design, sample size). Although adoptions proved to be effective (significantly different from zero), they were not as effective as the adapted or novel programs.

Conclusions

The results favor novel and adapted programs and indicate that adoption of transported, international programs should not be done without considering adaptation. Adaptations justified explicitly for cultural reasons were more effective than international adopted programs without adaptations. This adds to the prior literature, which has shown contradictory results regarding the effects of cultural adaptations [3]. With respect to the high effect size for novel programs, it may be that a novel program encompasses the greatest possible fit to the context where it takes place. Novel programs may even involve tailoring the program to the needs of the specific setting, compared to internationally transported programs that are originally developed for another context.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden
(4)
Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany

References

  1. Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A: Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science. 2013, 8: 65-10.1186/1748-5908-8-65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Moore JE, Bumbarger BK, Cooper BR: Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 2013, 34: 147-161. 10.1007/s10935-013-0303-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R, Smith P, Bellamy N: Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science. 2002, 3: 241-246. 10.1023/A:1019902902119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement