This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility
© Langston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 20 January 2005
Accepted: 24 May 2005
Published: 24 May 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Jan 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristina Staley|
|2 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Sitzia|
|11 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton|
|8 Apr 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Langston|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Apr 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Sitzia|
|4 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton|
|19 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Langston|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 May 2005||Editorially accepted|
|24 May 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-5-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.