Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jan 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristina Staley
2 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sitzia
11 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton
8 Apr 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anne Langston
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Apr 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sitzia
4 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton
19 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anne Langston
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 May 2005 Editorially accepted
24 May 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-39

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement