Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Social supports and mental health: a cross-sectional study on the correlation of self-consistency and congruence in China

BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:207

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1463-x

Received: 10 June 2015

Accepted: 25 May 2016

Published: 28 June 2016

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial job characteristics require nursing staff with high self-consistency and good mental health. However, the attention and effort of such study remained very limited in China.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the bedside nurses in an affiliated hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Of 218 registered bedside nurses eligible to participate in the survey anonymously, the data producing sample of 172 subjects resulted in a 79 % of effective response rate.. The Social Support Rating Scale was used to measure social support, and the Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale were used to measure mental health.

Results

Compared with the normal referenced group of college students, higher self-flexibility scores, lower self-conflict and self-stethoscope scores from the sample group were obtained with statistical significance in self-conflict scores. The close correlations were observed between participants’ social support and Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale score. The difference of Social Support Rating Scale score was significant in demographic features including years of work, marital status, only child family, and levels of cooperation with other health worker.

Conclusions

Bedside nurses in this study show a better inner harmony, and their Self-Consistency and Congruence closely correlates with the levels of social support. Thus, it is substantial to improve inner perception of support and external factors, such as the workplace support, and offer beneficial social environment to improve the bedside nurse’s sub-health symptoms and decrease the high turnover rate.

Keywords

Social support Mental health Bedside nurses Self-consistency and congruence

Background

There is desperate need for stable, well trained and fully engaged nursing staff to provide effective patient care in China. However, the turnover rate of the contract nurses at the hospital in the first two years of employment is approximately 70 %, which is a major issue impacting on the performance and profitability of hospital [1, 2]. While the factors that cause nursing turnover can be fairly complex, more attention has been paid to the two major elements including mental health and interpersonal relationships. Rogers [3] explained in his analysis that behavior changes, such as nurses’ determination of changing jobs, concomitantly or resultantly with the change of self perception and individual’s perception of reality. Thus, if we would probe the reason of nurses’ turnover, the concept of self should be measured. Self as it is emphasized in Rogers’ theory, is the consistency of the inner self, and the identification of oneself and experience. Self could also be understood as the cognition and comprehension of oneself. Wang [4] defines the self-harmony as lower self-stereotype (the feeling of inconsistency) and self-conflict (conflicts and assessment of confidence), and higher self-flexibility (the ability of coping with common events and situational demands).

Psychosocial job characteristics, social support, and sense of coherence are the key determinants of occupational mental health among nurses. Psychosocial job characteristics require nursing staff with high self-consistency and good mental health [5, 6]. Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) has been used to measure the nurses’ mental health, which focuses on description of psychosomatic symptoms [7]. However, SCL-90 was unable to further consider the situation and examine the relations between self-congruence and mental health. Mental well-being integrates pleasant physiological and emotional state, and good social adaptation. Therefore, it may not be accurate to evaluate the inner harmony using SCL-90 questionnaire [8]. In the present study, the Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale (SCCS) was employed in evaluation of mental health. Based on the current meta-analysis of nurses’ mental health measured by SCL-90, which indicates that, in general, Chinese nurses show higher scales (or worse mental health status) than normal samples [7], we assumed that the measurement of self-consistency and congruence are same.

Social support has a favorable impact on the maintenance of health and on coping with illness. Thus, social support as a valuable psychosocial factor could be used to predict the mental health status. Social support refers to one’s social bonds, social integration, and primary group relations. Strong social support to mental health has beneficial effects, such as feelings of love, care, respect and gratification [9]. The study of social support and its relationship to mental health has become one of the fastest growing areas of research and application in psychology [10, 11]. In early studies, social support was annotated with the society structural factors [12, 13]. Recently, researchers are focusing on the analysis of different social support resources and characteristics to probe their association with mental health [14]. Social support has been classified into objective support and subjective support [15]. Social support and mental health of special groups of nurses have received concerns in other cultures and positive correlation between social support and nurses’ turnover has been demonstrated [16, 17]. The researchers have explored the impact of social support on mental health of bedside nurses [17, 18]. However, the attention and effort of such study remained very limited in China. We propose a reconceptualization of social support by hypothesizing that the inner harmony with confident and tranquil emotional state may be influenced by the social relationships. We report empirical findings in order to provide the impact of social factors on social support.

Methods

Study design

A cross-sectional study was designed to test the correlation between the levels of social support and mental health in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) (see Additional file 1) was used to measured social support, and Self Consistency and Congruence Scale (SCCS) (see Additional file 2) were used to measure the levels of mental health [4, 19].

Study subjects

Participants signed a consent form allowing investigators to analyze their information. The recruited participants from different departments in the hospital have been working at least 36 h per week in 6 months. Three groups of bedside nurses were excluded from this study: nursing managers, supporting staff that worked on quality control, infection control and indirectly care for patients, and those who had been off work for more than one month in 6 consecutive months. The norm-referenced group, which were employed to compare with the sample group in SCCS scores, included 502 college students (260 males and 242 females, with an average of 18.5 (17–22) years old) [4].

Data collection

The anonymous self-administered questionnaire was distributed by a trained investigator during a meeting with the participants. The questionnaire included different items and scale to measure psychosocial risk, working and socio-demographic characteristics, the SCCS and the SSRS. The questionnaire also included an open-ended question to gather subjective opinions of participants on their working conditions and major problems. A total of 218 bedside nurses were administered the survey and required to complete the questionnaires in 30 min. Data from the group of college students were obtained from the published article [4], which were employed as standards in most published studies.

Questionnaire

There are two parts in the questionnaire survey.

Part-1 is the multiple choice format of assessment, including questions on the bedside nurse’s working department, marital status, years of work, cooperation with other health workers, health status, income, career decision, and education. Only one best possible answer was marked during the survey.

Part-2 is composed of the SCCS and SSRS. In SCCS, 35 questions are divided into three subscales. Subscale-1 included 16 questions on self-conflict; Subscale-2 had 12 questions on self-flexibility; Subscale-3 included 7 questions on self-stereotyping. The total SCCS score is the sum of results from the three subscales. Participants who have the higher scores of the subscale-1 (self-conflict) and subscale-3 (self-stereotype) showed the lower levels of self-consistency and mental health. In contrast, those who have the higher scores of the subscale-2 (self-flexibility) exhibited the higher levels of the interpersonal flexibility [4]. SSRS comprises three subscales: Subjective Support (question # 1 and 3–5), Objective Support (question # 2 and question 6–7), and Utilization of Social Support (question 8–10). The total SSRS score is the sum of the score from the three subscales. A higher score indicates more social support [19].

Statistical analysis

Each questionnaire was numbered and entered into a spreadsheet (Excel). Input errors were corrected by a third party. The statistical program SPSS version 10.0 was used for statistical analysis. A descriptive analysis was conducted on the demographic variables, SCCS and SSRS subscales. Questions such as only child, marital status, working department, position, years of work and career decision were coded as categorical variables; questions such as cooperation with other health worker, health status, income, and education were coded as ranked data; SCCS and SSRS were coded as continuous variables. Comparison tests were made between the participants and the college students. Correlation analysis was performed between subscales of the SCCS and SSRS. ANVOA was performed to test SSRS and subscale scores among different demographic groups. The level of statistical significance in each analysis was 5 %.

Results

Survey response

A total of 218 registered bedside nurses were administered the survey and required to complete the questionnaires in 30 min. 188 participants completed and returned the questionnaire with an overall return rate of 86 %. Out of the 188 participants, 16 participants didn’t response more than 5 questions and therefore were discarded. Thus, the effective response rate is 79 %.

Demographic characteristics of participants

In this study, participants were from different departments in the hospital and their demographic characteristics were listed in Table 1. The 172 effective responders aged from 19 to 42 years old with an average of 25.2 years old. About 55.8 % of participants were from the only child family. The percentage of participants with junior college was 70.3 %, and less than five years of work experience was 64.5 %. A total of 70.5 % of the participants was unmarried.
Table 1

Demographic character of the participants

Variable

Groups

Frequency

%

Department

Medicine

90

52.3

 

Surgery

32

18.6

 

Other

50

29.1

Years of work

Less than 5 years

111

64.5

 

More than 5 years

61

35.5

Education

Vocational school

17

9.9

 

Junior college

121

70.3

 

College

34

19.8

Marital status

Not married

112

70.5

 

Married

60

34.9

Only child family

Yes

96

55.8

 

No

76

44.2

Participants’ SCCS scores compared with college students

The subscales of SCCS between the participants and the college students were analyzed by t test (Table 2). The score of self-conflict of the participants were lower than those of college students.
Table 2

Comparison of SCCS scores between bedside nurses and college students (\( \overline{\mathrm{x}}\pm \mathrm{s} \))

 

Bedside nurses (n = 172)

College students (n = 502)

t

P

Self-conflict

40.20 ± 9.16

46.13 ± 10.00

6.85

<0.01

Self-flexibility

46.67 ± 8.97

45.44 ± 7.44

−1.77

0.08

Self-stethoscope

17.34 ± 3.92

18.12 ± 5.09

1.83

0.07

Note. SCCS stands for self-consistency and congruence scale

Correlation analysis between SCCS and SSRS and subscales

The correlation analysis between SCCS and SSRS and subscales were performed (Shown in Table 3). There were negative correlations between subjective support and self-conflict, subjective support and self-flexibility, subjective support and total SCCS score, objective support and self-flexibility, and utilization of social support and self-stereotype.
Table 3

Correlation analysis between total-score and sub-scores of SCCS and SSRS in bedside nurses

 

Objective support

Utilization of support

Subjective support

Total SSRS

Self–conflict

Self-stereotype

Self-flexibility

Total SCCS

Objective support

1.00b

--

--

--

−0.11b

−0.13b

−0.33b

−0.14b

Utilization of Support

--

1.00b

--

--

−0.06b

−0.22b

0.11b

−0.13b

Subjective support

--

--

1.00b

--

−0.23b

−0.06b

−0.20b

−0.27b

Total SSRS

--

--

--

1.00b

−0.23b

−0.20b

−0.25b

−0.22b

Self-conflict

0.27a

0.53a

0.02a

0.02a

1.00b

--

--

--

Self-stethoscope

0.18a

0.02a

0.56a

0.05a

--

1.00b

--

--

Self-flexibility

<0.01a

0.28a

0.04a

0.01a

--

--

1.00b

--

Total SCCS

0.70a

0.08a

0.03a

0.01a

--

--

--

1.00b

Note. aP value; bcorrelation coefficient

SCCS stands for self-consistency and congruence scale. SSRS stands for social support rating scale

SSRS and subscale scores in different social demographic groups

ANVOA F-test was performed for SSRS among different groups with different demographic features, and the results were summarized in Table 4. There were significant statistical differences in the total SSRS scores between years of work, level of health status, type of the career decision, income, marriage status, whether the only child family, and level of cooperation with other health workers. It showed significant statistical difference in Objective Support between marriage status, and level of cooperation with other health worker. There were also significant statistical differences in Subjective Support between years of work, level of education, marriage status, income and whether the only child family. A significant statistical difference was observed in Utilization of Social Support between level of health status and type of the career decision.
Table 4

ANVOA F-test of SSRS between different groups under different demographic features (\( \overline{\mathrm{x}}\pm \mathrm{s} \))

Demographic features

n

Total SSRS score

Objective support score

Subjective support score

Utilization of social support

Department

     

 Medicine

90

34.02 ± 4.67

11.60 ± 2.00

8.47 ± 1.47

8.34 ± 1.59

 Surgery

32

34.94 ± 4.73

11.84 ± 2.41

8.41 ± 1.24

8.88 ± 1.62

 Other department

50

32.71 ± 4.65

10.96 ± 2.27

8.38 ± 1.56

8.42 ± 1.32

F

 

1.43

1.03

0.97

1.08

Years of work

     

 Less than 5 years

111

33.27 ± 4.63

11.25 ± 2.14

8.18 ± 1.24

8.46 ± 1.62

 More than 5 years

61

35.04 ± 4.89

12.00 ± 1.89

8.83 ± 1.61

8.38 ± 1.67

F

 

2.56*

2.29

4.77**

0.98

Education

     

 Vocation school

17

31.76 ± 4.15

10.65 ± 1.32

8.12 ± 1.77

7.82 ± 1.77

 Junior college

121

34.12 ± 4.83

11.58 ± 2.23

8.33 ± 1.39

8.58 ± 1.54

 College

34

34.15 ± 4.59

11.73 ± 1.89

8.91 ± 1.52

8.21 ± 1.86

F

 

1.91

1.37

2.79*

2.09

Health status

     

 So-so

37

33.54 ± 4.81

11.42 ± 1.97

8.62 ± 1.53

8.80 ± 1.65

 Good

43

33.47 ± 4.74

11.45 ± 1.97

8.35 ± 1.43

8.12 ± 1.70

 Excellent

91

34.54 ± 4.64

11.70 ± 2.19

8.37 ± 1.36

8.56 ± 1.56

F

 

2.92*

1.98

0.32

3.11*

Career decision

     

 Self-decision

97

34.41 ± 4.71

11.76 ± 2.11

8.51 ± 1.32

8.57 ± 1.72

 By parents

58

33.28 ± 4.75

11.11 ± 2.02

8.30 ± 1.42

8.21 ± 1.47

 By others

7

36.28 ± 4.53

12.14 ± 2.11

8.57 ± 1.81

10.00 ± 0.57

 Unknow

10

31.53 ± 4.29

11.15 ± 2.33

8.15 ± 1.77

7.61 ± 1.44

F

 

2.44*

1.53

0.47

4.02**

Income

     

 1000–2000 RMB

37

32.58 ± 4.81

10.84 ± 2.12

8.17 ± 1.23

8.25 ± 1.66

 2001–3000 RMB

92

33.51 ± 4.39

11.65 ± 2.01

8.15 ± 1.22

8.39 ± 1.63

 3001–4000 RMB

22

34.62 ± 4.93

11.56 ± 2.35

8.71 ± 1.74

8.43 ± 1.58

  > 4001 RMB

21

36.41 ± 4.81

12.08 ± 1.93

9.33 ± 1.40

8.91 ± 1.66

F

 

3.84*

2.05

5.61**

0.87

Marital status

     

 Single

112

32.78 ± 4.68

10.96 ± 2.09

8.02 ± 1.11

8.48 ± 1.61

 Married

60

36.41 ± 4.57

12.56 ± 1.73

9.16 ± 1.67

8.35 ± 1.69

F

 

20.56**

26.00**

30.70**

0.27

Only child family

     

 Yes

96

34.35 ± 6.46

8.06 ± 3.72

8.53 ± 3.68

7.76 ± 1.39

 No

76

40.93 ± 6.37

9.32 ± 3.12

13.00 ± 3.96

8.51 ± 1.62

F

 

3.84**

1.31

4.47**

1.94

Cooperation with other health worker

     

 Smooth

25

35.62 ± 4.90

12.48 ± 2.06

8.51 ± 1.86

8.55 ± 1.76

 So-so

142

33.71 ± 4.65

11.43 ± 2.01

8.39 ± 1.29

8.39 ± 1.62

 Not well

5

30.66 ± 4.63

9.16 ± 2.56

8.50 ± 1.97

9.16 ± 1.32

F

 

3.38*

7.10**

0.09

0.72

Note. *P < .05. **P < .01

SSRS stands for social support rating scale

Discussion

SCCS scores showed good self-consistency and congruence status

The difference between the realistic self-concept and ideal self-concept is an important index of the mental health. Accordingly, our study employed SCCS to measure mental health of bedside nurse from the inner side of self. Contrary to the result of systematic review of nurses’ mental health measured by SCL-90 [7], the scores of self-consistency and congruence in the sample group show a good inner harmony status, with higher self-flexibility, lower self-conflict and self-stethoscope. This could lead us to the explanation that the symptoms detected by SCL-90 may come from outside, rather the inner self as Wang and Rogers indicated that the inconsistency between oneself and experience includes the evaluation of one’s ability and emotion, self-consistence and the feeling of helplessness [4, 20]. Those who take nursing profession as the lifelong career need to adjust individual self-concept and adapt to the role of caregiver. Therefore, improved self-flexibility is highly demanded. Only those who show higher levels of self-flexibility and lower levels of self-conflict could enjoy the job and show optimism at workplace. In present study, participants had the lower self-conflict score compared to the college students reported in previous study [4]. Our results showed that it is more natural for the bedside nurses to accept their role as the public health workers. The bedside nurses also receive positive recognition from patients, peers and family, whereas the college student has less respond from working environment. Working experience is the major difference between bedside nurses and college students besides their age difference. Therefore, the respond and support from work environment may play an important role to the bedside nurses’ self- consistency.

Social support, self-consistency, and congruence

Published studies suggested an alleviating effect of social support on mental stress and psychological barrier [21]. People with strong social support have less stress and fewer negative. Indeed, social support plays a substantial role in improving individual’s mental health [22]. Better social support has positive correlation with higher level of mental health in nursing workforces [5] [10, 2325]. The present study found a significant correlation between SCCS and SSRS scores in bedside nurses. Social support offers a resolution to relive life and career stress. It helps the individual to reduce the perceived importance of problems and the detrimental effects of stress [5, 22, 24]. There was also a negative correlation between subjective support and self-conflict subscales. This indicated that the more self-conflict the person has, the less support she thinks she receives. Thus, it suggests that the clinical manager should offer help to this type of person to let her to realize there is supportive resources around.

Factors influence bedside nurses’ social support

In the present study, the participants with more than 5 years of work experience have higher SSRS scores and subjective support scores. These findings may also suggest that those with higher subjective support may stay longer in the nursing position. Education is another factor that causes the difference in social support scores. The higher education the individual receives the higher score of her subjective social support is. Utilization of social support is a factor that has partially impact on health status. Those who know where and how to get help from people around show a higher level of utilization of social support. This is further demonstrated in this study on the career decision and marital status since the couple or family is one of the most important resources of social support [26]. Similarly, relationship with co-workers as an important factor that affects objective scores is also well explained by the basic concept of social support. Some study found that the nurses need more support from organization and co-workers to reduce workplace stress, and the social support from co-workers is associated with the status of nurses’ mental health [27]. Meanwhile, poor personal relationship at workplace is associated with difficult in judgment and decision making [28]. Thus, improvement in workplace support and individual interpersonal skills is highly recommended. Only-child family and income are the influence factors that have impact on the score of SSRS. However, these factors having the local and complex feature are affected by the policy of population and education, and the economic status.

Conclusion

Bedside nurses in this study show better self-congruence compared to the college students. Their mental health closely correlates with the levels of social support. Individual characteristics such as marriage, years of work, education, self-assessed health, career decision, cooperation with other health worker, only-child family and income have influence on social support the person receives and perceives. Therefore, it is substantial to improve inner perception of support and external workplace support, and offer beneficial social environment to decrease the high turnover rate of bedside nurses.

Abbreviations

ANVOA, analysis of variance; SCCS, Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale; SCL-90, Symptom Checklist-90; SRRS, Social Support Rating Scale

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Hong Wang from MD Anderson Cancer Center for his help in the final manuscript. Also, we would like to thank Fang Xie and Li Yang for their help in the clinical investigation.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on request.

Authors’ contributions

YG carried out the investigation of bedside nurses, and drafted the manuscript. JW participated in the design of the study. JH performed the statistical analysis. YH participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

Participants in the study signed an informed consent from allowing investigators to use their information. Nurses were assured that no names would be attached to the data, to ensure that no one could be personally indentified.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by Ethic Committee of HeBei Medical University.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
PLA Medical School
(2)
School of Nursing, HeBei Medical University
(3)
Department of Nursing, ShiJiaZhuang No. One Hospital

References

  1. Zhao MY, Zhang X. Analysis of related factors about employed nurses departed from post and new measures for management. Chin Nurs Res. 2010;24(4A):915–6.Google Scholar
  2. Yu SY, Liu Q, Xu JM. The reason for the loss of nurses in remote hospitals and the coping method. J Nurs Educ. 2009;24(9):67–9.Google Scholar
  3. Rogers CR. Some observations on the organization of personality. Am Psychol. 1947;2(9):358–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang DF. The develop of SCCS. Chin Clin Psychol. 1994;2(1):19–22.Google Scholar
  5. AbuAlRub RF. Job stress, job performance, and social support among hospital nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(1):73–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Amiot CE, de la Sablonniere R, Terry DJ, Smith JR. Integration of social identities in the self: toward a cognitive-developmental model. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11(4):364–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yuan X, Liu WL, Zhang YS. Meta analysis of mental health status of Chinese nurses. J HeZe Med Coll. 2012;24(2):49–51.Google Scholar
  8. Hu JS, Wang DF. The relation model of social support, personality and mental health. J Chin Clin Psycol. 2006;14(4):387–92.Google Scholar
  9. Finfgeld-Connett D. Clarification of social support. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(1):4–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cicchetti D, Cohen D J. 1. Social Support and Developmental Psychopathology[M]// Developmental Psychopathology, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2015:1–37.Google Scholar
  12. Berkman LF. Social support, social networks, social cohesion and health. Soc Work Health Care. 2000;31(2):3–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social sopport and the buffering hypothesis. Psychosocial Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Deborah F-C. Concept comparison of caring and social support. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(2):58–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Xiao SY. Theory bases and applying of Social Support Rating Scales (SSRS). J Clin Psychol. 1994;4(2):98–9.Google Scholar
  16. Hamaideh HS. Burnout, social support, and job satisfaction among Jordanian mental health nurses. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2011;32(4):234–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heijden BIJM, Kümmerling A, Dam K, Schoot E, Estryn-Béhar M, Hasselhorn HM. The impact of social support upon intention to leave among female nurses in Europe: Secondary analysis of data from the NEXT survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(4):434–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thanacoody PR, Bartram T, Casimir G. The effects of burnout and supervisory social support on the relationship between work family conflict and intention to leave Australian cancer worker. J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(1):53–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Xiao SY. Social Support Rating Scales (SSRS). J Chin Ment Health. 1999;13:127–30.Google Scholar
  20. Rogers CR, Kell BL, Mc NH. The role of self-understanding in the prediction of behavior. J Consult Psychol. 1948;12(3):174–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):458–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Bovier PA, Chamot E, Perneger TV. Perceived stress, internal resources, and social support as determinants of mental health among young adults. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:161–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma J, Li YA. Relationship between social support on self-consistency of university students. China J Health Psychol. 2008;16(7):745–6.Google Scholar
  24. Cao M, Kan J. Influence of social support on career identification in nurses. Nurs Res. 2010;24(2):380–1.Google Scholar
  25. Rui L, Miao DM, Li HZ, Fu J, Zhu XQ. Research on the Nurse’s social support. Chin Appl Nurs Res. 2008;24(3):18–20.Google Scholar
  26. Larocco J, House J, French J. Social support, occupational stress, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 1980;21:202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang JX, Ye ZH. Release Nurses’ stress by peer worker support system. Chin J Nurs. 2004;09:48–50.Google Scholar
  28. Kishi R, Kitaharak T, Masuchi A, Kasai S. Work-related reproductive, musculoskeletal and mental disorders among working women. Ind Health. 2002;40:102–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016