This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 19 October 2015
Accepted: 20 June 2016
Published: 11 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iris van der Heide|
|18 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Remo Ostini|
|21 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Julii Brainard|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Julii Brainard|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1479-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.