Reasons, perceived outcomes and characteristics of second-opinion seekers: are there differences in private vs. public settings?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Oct 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Turner|
|2 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lizheng Shi|
|7 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Liora Shmueli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lizheng Shi|
|3 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Liora Shmueli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Apr 2019||Editorially accepted|
|23 Apr 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12913-019-4067-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.