Tracking the evolution of hospice palliative care in Canada: A comparative case study analysis of seven provinces
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Jan 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Seamark|
|7 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Friedemann Nauck|
|29 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Dykeman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Dykeman|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|25 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-147|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.