You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy: an explorative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Carlos Souto
29 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanna Kaduszkiewicz
5 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hanneke Drewes
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Carlos Souto
25 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanna Kaduszkiewicz
21 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hanneke Drewes
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Hanneke Drewes
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement