You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: A systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy Kressin
26 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Zeber
15 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
2 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pauline Boeckxstaens
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Zeber
2 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
17 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pauline Boeckxstaens
Resubmission - Version 3
17 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pauline Boeckxstaens
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pauline Boeckxstaens
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pauline Boeckxstaens
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
31 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-209

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement