You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: A mixed methods study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Polly Noel
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Francis
8 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Wallace
6 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Laura Damschroder
Resubmission - Version 2
6 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Francis
27 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Wallace
15 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Polly Noel
25 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Laura Damschroder
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Wallace
17 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Laura Damschroder
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Laura Damschroder
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Laura Damschroder
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
30 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
30 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-248

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement