You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Usefulness and acceptability of a standardised orientation and mobility training for partially-sighted older adults using an identification cane

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Crossland
4 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff
4 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Judith Ballemans
Resubmission - Version 2
4 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 May 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-141

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.