You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinicians’ and patients’ views of metrics of change derived from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for comparing providers’ performance of surgery

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock
3 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stirling Bryan
7 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Zoe Hildon
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stirling Bryan
29 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Zoe Hildon
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
21 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-171

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement