Is there a gap between recommended and ‘real world’ practice in the management of depression in young people? A medical file audit of practice
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Hetrick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gary Rodin|
|6 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karina Forrest Perkins|
|25 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Hetrick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-178|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.