You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Attempt to increase the transparency of fourth hurdle implementation in Central-Eastern European middle income countries: publication of the critical appraisal methodology

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wija Oortwijn
30 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kalipso Chalkidou
7 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - András Inotai
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wija Oortwijn
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-332

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement