You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative study of stakeholder views on the effects of provider payment on cooperation, quality of care and cost-containment in integrated stroke care

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Johanneke Tummers
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robbert Huijsman
14 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jong-Deuk Baek
31 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Johanneke Tummers
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Johanneke Tummers
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
2 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Johanneke Tummers
Resubmission - Version 8
2 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
2 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Johanneke Tummers
Resubmission - Version 9
2 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 9
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robbert Huijsman
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
27 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-127

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement