You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Empirical evidence of the continuing improvement in cost efficiency of an endoscopic surveillance programme for gastric cancer in Singapore from 2004 to 2010

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeff Guo
31 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuhiko Inoue
15 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Huijun Zhou
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeff Guo
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-139

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.