You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kay Currie
28 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Tarrant
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Molly Harrod
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Molly Harrod
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kay Currie
13 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Tarrant
28 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Molly Harrod
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-151

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement