You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniela Goncalves
7 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Greenhalgh
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jack Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniela Goncalves
15 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Greenhalgh
7 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jack Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
7 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Greenhalgh
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 May 2013 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement