You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 AIHW survey, AMPCo doctor list and indirectly derived FTE/FWE are correlated at the DGP scale

From: General practitioner (family physician) workforce in Australia: comparing geographic data from surveys, a mailing list and medicare

     AMPCo doctor list FTE    
AMPCo doctor list and AIHW survey AIHW survey FTE   Metro Inner Regional Outer Regional Remote Very Remote Overall
Metro 0.97(0.95,0.99)      
Inner Regional   0.93(0.81,0.99)     
Outer Regional    0.95(0.79,0.98)    
Remote     0.83(0.55,0.99)   
Very Remote      0.60(−0.89,1.00)  
Overall       0.98 (0.96,0.99)
Indirectly derived FWE and AIHW survey AIHW survey FTE    Indirectly derived FWE    
  Metro Inner Regional Outer Regional Remote Very Remote Overall
Metro 0.87(0.81,0.93)      
Inner Regional   0.88(0.77,0.97)     
Outer Regional    0.91(0.64,0.97)    
Remote     0.82(0.56,0.99)   
Very Remote      0.78(0.26,1.00)  
Overall       0.90 (0.86,0.94)
AMPCo doctor list and Indirectly derived FWE Indirectly derived FWE    AMPCo doctor list FTE    
  Metro Inner Regional Outer Regional Remote Very Remote Overall
Metro 0.82(0.74,0.90)      
Inner Regional   0.95(0.93,0.98)     
Outer Regional    0.97(0.84,0.99)    
Remote     0.97(0.80,1.00)   
Very Remote      0.47(−0.80,0.98)  
   Overall       0.87(0.81,0.92)
  1. Not shown in this table are overall FWE/FTE correlations between in the PHCRIS survey and AIHW 0.82 (0.74, 0.88), PHCRIS survey, AMPCo doctor list 0.81 (0.72-0.88), PHCRIS survey and indirectly derived FWE 0.87 (0.80, 0.92).