You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Secondary care intervals before and after the introduction of urgent referral guidelines for suspected cancer in Denmark: a comparative before-after study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nafees Din
30 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Forbes
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mette Bach Larsen
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nafees Din
27 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Forbes
5 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mette Bach Larsen
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-348

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement