Developing content for a process-of-care checklist for use in intensive care units: a dual-method approach to establishing construct validity
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Seiji Bito|
|4 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mirella Minkman|
|14 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristina Weeks|
|2 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Karena Conroy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Karena Conroy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mirella Minkman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-380|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.