You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinically relevant quality measures for risk factor control in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Weiler
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Weiler
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asaf Bitton
10 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lipika Samal
16 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Weiler
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Weiler
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Weiler
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
15 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-306

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement