You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Bridging the gap between current practice recommendations in national guidelines - a qualitative study of mental health services

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 3 and
  • 1, 2
BMC Health Services Research201414 (Suppl 2) :P94

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-S2-P94

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Mental Health Service
  • National Guideline
  • Action Schema
  • Inpatient Unit
  • Dual Diagnosis

Background

“National guideline for assessment, treatment and social rehabilitation of persons with concurrent substance use disorders and mental disorders”, launched March 2012, is aimed at a wide range of health services. It holds a separate chapter on implementation.

The National Centre for Dual Diagnosis was commissioned by the Norwegian Directorate of Health to develop a plan for implementation of the Guideline. It contains tools to strengthen management, clinicians and consumers. A clinical audit tool was made to measure research-practice-gap. The clinical audit is the start-point of the implementation-plan, followed by an action schema. The implementation-process is as follows:
  • Identify today’s practice assessed against recommendations in the guideline, doing a clinical audit

  • Identify areas of improvement based on the clinical audit
    1. a)

      choose a goal for improvement

       
    2. b)

      select initiatives based on goals

       
    3. c)

      allocate responsibility

       
    4. d)

      describe progress

       
  • Implementation phase

  • Evaluate by a new clinical audit and summarize experiences

This project aims to understand the process of using clinical audit as a basis for making choices aimed at clinical improvement in district psychiatric clinics. The objectives of the study are to describe and explore the implementation-process from the use of clinical audit to change in practice.

Materials and methods

Three different methods will be used, all qualitative, to explore the process: 1) observation of meetings, minutes of meetings etc. from the presentation of results from the clinical audit to a fully described action schema, 2) focus-group interview with participants from each of the included units after second clinical audit, and 3) individual interviews with head of the units after second clinical audit. There is a desire to open up for experiences, perceptions, attitudes and narratives.

The setting is four units at a district psychiatric clinic, one outpatient clinic, two inpatient units, and one psychiatric outpatient emergency team.

Results

First observations are done and analysis pending. Preliminary results from the observation part of the study may be presented in July.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
(3)
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Copyright

© Pedersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement