You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: A transdisciplinary study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Dec 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2002 Author responded Author comments - Peter Singer
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Feb 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J Schilling
17 Apr 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tony Hope
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 May 2002 Author responded Author comments - Peter Singer
Resubmission - Version 5
29 May 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Jun 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tony Hope
20 Jun 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J Schilling
15 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Peter Singer
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jul 2002 Editorially accepted
18 Jul 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-2-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement