You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Apr 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jun 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Tammy Clifford
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jul 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic
25 Aug 2002 Author responded Author comments - Tammy Clifford
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Aug 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic
3 Sep 2002 Author responded Author comments - Tammy Clifford
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Sep 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 Sep 2002 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-2-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement