You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Apr 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Apr 2003 Author responded Author comments - Scott Sehon
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2003 Author responded Author comments - Scott Sehon
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Denise Dupras
5 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Upshur
4 Jun 2003 Author responded Author comments - Scott Sehon
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jun 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jun 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Upshur
15 Jul 2003 Author responded Author comments - Scott Sehon
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jul 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Jul 2003 Editorially accepted
21 Jul 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-3-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement