You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Aug 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tommaso Trenti
25 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle
18 Nov 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Nov 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Nov 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Nov 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Dec 2003 Author responded Author comments - Alessandro Liberati
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Dec 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
23 Dec 2003 Editorially accepted
23 Dec 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-3-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement