You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Is there value in using physician billing claims along with other administrative health care data to document the burden of adolescent injury? An exploratory investigation with comparison to self-reports in Ontario, Canada

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Aug 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Forjuoh
30 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleni Petridou
21 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Beth Potter
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Forjuoh
4 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Beth Potter
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Beth Potter
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Feb 2005 Editorially accepted
18 Feb 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement