You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jul 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Terry Cronan
29 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan
30 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Neill Baskerville
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Terry Cronan
30 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Neill Baskerville
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Neill Baskerville
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 Mar 2005 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement