You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Sep 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Mitton
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - David Reeleder
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - David Reeleder
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - David Reeleder
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Jan 2005 Editorially accepted
21 Jan 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement