You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of on-site cardiac catheterization on resource utilization and fatal and non-fatal outcomes after acute myocardial infarction

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Mar 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
10 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Wright
5 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hillegass
31 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Louise Pilote
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Louise Pilote
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hillegass
7 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Wright
26 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Louise Pilote
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Louise Pilote
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Nov 2006 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-6-148

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement