You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods underpinning national clinical guidelines for hypertension: describing the evidence shortfall

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Aug 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aileen McIntosh
13 Nov 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc van Wijk
27 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - James Mason
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - James Mason
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc van Wijk
8 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aileen McIntosh
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2006 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-6-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement