You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness analysis of guidelines for antihypertensive care in Finland

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Dec 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
16 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neill Booth
Resubmission - Version 2
16 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neill Booth
Resubmission - Version 3
22 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
13 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Wisløff
8 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neill Booth
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
14 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Wisløff
18 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neill Booth
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Oct 2007 Editorially accepted
24 Oct 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-7-172

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement