You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Bate
30 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilfreda E. Thurston
27 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Doug Martin
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilfreda E. Thurston
7 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Bate
29 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Doug Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilfreda E. Thurston
16 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Doug Martin
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Nov 2007 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-7-186

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement