You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caro van Uden
7 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Rosemann
8 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Mitchell
16 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Annette Berendsen
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Annette Berendsen
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Rosemann
21 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Annette Berendsen
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Annette Berendsen
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Jan 2007 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-7-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement