You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
4 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prasanta Dey
12 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
4 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
7 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 4
7 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hideo Yasunaga
Resubmission - Version 5
16 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 May 2008 Editorially accepted
21 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement