You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Nov 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Hotchkiss
26 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margus Lember
16 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neil Andersson
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Hotchkiss
22 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margus Lember
4 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
11 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neil Andersson
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
6 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Neil Andersson
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
2 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Neil Andersson
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
21 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement