You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jan 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
29 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager
30 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Davina Ghersi
31 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christiane Druml
18 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Martin Scherer
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager
24 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Davina Ghersi
23 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Martin Scherer
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager
7 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Girdhar Agarwal
10 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Martin Scherer
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Martin Scherer
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
23 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement