You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effect of response format for clinical vignettes on reporting quality of physician practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emilio Filippucci
27 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Thao Pham
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Thao Pham
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Thao Pham
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Thao Pham
Resubmission - Version 6
15 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-128

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement