You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
4 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Dart
9 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simonetta Scalvini
15 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Julie Peconi
Resubmission - Version 2
15 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
11 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simonetta Scalvini
8 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
18 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Julie Peconi
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Julie Peconi
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Julie Peconi
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
30 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-178

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement