You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Uptake of evidence in policy development: the case of user fees for health care in public health facilities in Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jun 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Dagenais
16 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Shearer
13 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Dagenais
6 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Shearer
18 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
18 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12913-014-0639-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement