You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Implementing shared decision making in federally qualified health centers, a quasi-experimental design study: the Office-Guidelines Applied to Practice (Office-GAP) program

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oliver Hirsch
5 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Negin Hajizadeh
21 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Yu
6 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Adesuwa Olomu
Resubmission - Version 2
6 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oliver Hirsch
30 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Yu
1 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Negin Hajizadeh
22 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Adesuwa Olomu
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1603-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement