Implementing shared decision making in federally qualified health centers, a quasi-experimental design study: the Office-Guidelines Applied to Practice (Office-GAP) program
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Hirsch|
|5 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Negin Hajizadeh|
|21 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Yu|
|6 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Adesuwa Olomu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Hirsch|
|30 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Yu|
|1 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Negin Hajizadeh|
|22 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Adesuwa Olomu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|2 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1603-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.