You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhimin Xiao
28 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dingxin Qin
27 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Charmi Patel
Resubmission - Version 2
27 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Charmi Patel
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
5 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1607-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement