A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhimin Xiao|
|28 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dingxin Qin|
|27 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Charmi Patel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Charmi Patel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1607-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.