The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Davy|
|25 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geetha Ranmuthugala|
|29 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley|
|17 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Bernadette Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Davy|
|31 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geetha Ranmuthugala|
|4 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley|
|13 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Bernadette Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1615-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.