You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Can local staff reliably assess their own programs? A confirmatory test-retest study of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling data collectors in Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anwer Aqil
24 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo
25 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Colin Beckworth
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1655-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement