Can local staff reliably assess their own programs? A confirmatory test-retest study of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling data collectors in Uganda
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anwer Aqil|
|24 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo|
|25 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Colin Beckworth|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Aug 2016||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1655-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.