Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Erratum
  • Open Access

Erratum to: Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6 and
  • 7
BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:444

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1681-2

  • Published:

The original article was published in BMC Health Services Research 2015 15:150

Erratum

There is a typographical error on p. 7 of the article [1], where it states, “…24.0 % (n = 17,175) were categorized as receiving early physical therapy that was also adherent to the recommendation for active treatment, 19.2 % (n = 13,742) received delayed physical therapy that was adherent, 23,993 (33.5 %) received delayed and adherent care, and 16,649 (23.3 %) received physical therapy that was delayed and non-adherent.” As can be seen, reference to the “delayed and adherent” category is mentioned twice.

Based on Table 4, the second reference to “delayed and adherent” care should have read “early and non-adherent” care. The corrected text is as follows:

“…24.0 % (n = 17,175) were categorized as receiving early physical therapy that was also adherent to the recommendation for active treatment, 19.2 % (n = 13,742) received delayed physical therapy that was adherent, 23,993 (33.5 %) received early and non-adherent care, and 16,649 (23.3 %) received physical therapy that was delayed and non-adherent.”

This typographical correction makes the text in the manuscript now consistent with the data in Table 4, which is correct as originally published.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Army Medical Department Center and School, US Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, 3151 Scott Rd., Rm. 2307, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA
(2)
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
(3)
Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16th St., Rm. 5231, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA
(4)
EIM School of Physical Therapy, South College, 3904 Lonas Dr, Knoxville, TN 37909, USA
(5)
Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
(6)
US Army Medical Department Center and School, US Army-Baylor MHA/MBA Program, 3599 Winfield Scott Rd., Bldg. 2841, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234-6135, USA
(7)
Department of Physical Therapy, Director, Brooks-PHHP Research Collaboration, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100154, Gainesville, FL 32610-0154, USA

Reference

  1. Childs et al. Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement