You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of survival in adult antiretroviral treatment naïve patients treated in primary health care centers versus those treated in hospitals: retrospective cohort study ; Oromia region, Ethiopia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilles Wandeler
10 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peggy Millson
5 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Abebe Megerso
Resubmission - Version 2
5 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilles Wandeler
15 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peggy Millson
13 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Abebe Megerso
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Abebe Megerso
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1818-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement